In Conclusion . . . . . . . and more resources
After looking at all the research that is available on teaching grammar (and there is more than one person could read in a lifetime) I think that there is overwhelming evidence that grammar should be taught. The question then becomes, “How should grammar be taught?” In an article entitled “On Not Teaching Grammar”, the author describes “anti-grammarians” as “a horse without a cart”. The “pro-grammarians are the “cart before the horse” and those that ask “if not grammar then what should we teach?” as “pulling the cart out front”. The author goes to a lot of trouble to basically communicate the idea that students should be able to recognize “grammatical constructions” in their own writing and make revisions when needed. My question is how are they going to recognize what needs to be revised if they are not familiar with standard English grammar? So the question truly is not if grammar should be taught, but how.
I posted several articles on various strategies to teach grammar that involve students in learning activities that are meaningful, and certainly they are not boring. One activity that is very simple to implement in the classroom involves a teacher who throws her keys on the floor. She asks her students to make a sentence about the action. The sentence, Ms. Boggs threw her keys on the floor. becomes a stem to which the students add clauses, change from active to passive voice, identify the subject and predicate, etc. Many times the teacher involves the students in actions and they create sentences this way. This makes the grammar lesson relevant to the students and keeps their interest level up so that they stay involved and not bored.
One article that I found, Teaching Reading and Writing to Struggling Middle School and High School Students: the Case for Reciprocal Teaching, deals with teaching writing skills to students for whom English is a second language and to students who have a learning disability. I did not post the link to the article because it has very little to do with teaching grammar, but it made me stop and think how I would address teaching grammar to students who are below the “norm” (whatever the norm is).
Several articles reference Carol Weaver’s book that I have posted in my blog. Another book that was referenced many times is Harry Noden’s Image Grammar: Using Grammatical Structures to Teach Writing. Two other resources that I ran across is an article entitled Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle And High Schools by Steve Graham and Dolores Perin. One of the highlights of the article is a section: Eleven Elements of Effective Adolescent Writing Instruction. The National Writing Project published a book, 30 Ideas for Teaching Writing, that looks like a great resource.
The bottom line is that grammar should be taught, but it does not have to be daily language drills. Grammar lessons can be engaging and effective; if a teacher wants to make grammar lessons exciting, there are lots of resources, to be purchased or for free that can support that desire.